banner



Are Cameras Still Worth It

The Samsung Galaxy Camera NX: dSLR, meet smartphone. Smartphone, meet dSLR.
The Samsung Galaxy Camera NX: dSLR, meet smartphone. Smartphone, see dSLR. Samsung

A petty over a twelvemonth agone I asked CNET readers if it however made sense to purchase a camcorder.

Subsequently all, as my thinking went, smartphone cameras tin at present capture 1080p video, and they take the virtue of riding effectually in your pocket, e'er at the ready for memorable moments.

The consensus? Not anybody has a smartphone, thank you very much, and smartphones nearly universally lack optical zoom -- meaning they're far from platonic for faraway shooting. Verdict: for some folks, camcorders remain the all-time way to capture video.

OK, but what about cameras? Some of the aforementioned reasoning applies: most smartphones can take snapshots ranging from decent to fantastic, and they're always at the prepare for memorable moments. (Annotation I didn't say "Kodak moments" because younger readers will have no idea what I'k talking about.)

Hence, today's question: Does information technology still brand sense to buy a digital camera?

I enquire because camera makers are working to hard to lure buyers back from smartphone reliance, packing in nifty features like apps, Wi-Fi, Facebook and Twitter integration, and and so on -- you know, all the stuff you lot already take on your phone.

Witness, for example, the Samsung Galaxy Photographic camera NX, a new model that, when viewed from the front end, looks like a fairly typical dSLR, but from the back could easily exist mistaken for an Android smartphone. Which it practically is, given the built-in 3G/4G LTE. So you become all the benefits of a huge touch-screen interface, plus full-fourth dimension Net connectivity, in a camera with dSLR shooting prowess.

At the other end of the spectrum, a model like the Canon PowerShot North offers Wi-Fi and a tilting touch screen in a meaty shooter. Y'all don't become apps, only you do get an 8x optical zoom.

Indeed, I would argue that features like zoom, a bigger epitome sensor, and avant-garde settings (aperture priority, etc.) make the case for owning a defended photographic camera -- peculiarly if information technology tin can easily pair with your phone for quick uploading to Facebook, Instagram, on the similar.

On the other paw: one more than affair to carry, one more affair to go along charged, one more than thing to go ruined past sand at the beach. (I've tanked at least two cameras this way.)

I'1000 torn on this outcome. My iPhone 4S takes pictures that are "good enough," by which I hateful they suffice for well-nigh situations, even if I sometimes detect the image quality and lack of features, well, defective. And I enjoy living hassle-free, significant I definitely don't want another device bulging my pockets. Merely for those times when I want to capture, say, my girl'south soccer game, the iPhone is all but useless.

What are your thoughts on this? Vote in our poll, so hit the comments to brand your photographic camera feelings known. Are they still worth having, or does your phone practice a good plenty job?


On the "yes" side of this argument? Check out CNET's ever-current list of the all-time digital cameras on the market.

Source: https://www.cnet.com/tech/computing/does-it-still-make-sense-to-buy-a-digital-camera-poll/

Posted by: thomasdarromed.blogspot.com

0 Response to "Are Cameras Still Worth It"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel